Skip to content

Subsonic Aerodynamics | Aerodynamic Degradation | PPL(A) Principles of Flight

Aerodynamic degradation — icing, contamination, and their effects on aircraft performance for PPL(A) candidates

Aerodynamic degradation refers to any reduction in an aircraft’s aerodynamic performance caused by contamination of its surfaces or systems. Ice is the most significant and dangerous form of contamination — even a thin layer can dramatically alter the aircraft’s behaviour.


Ice on an aircraft creates hazards across four categories:

  • Reduces lift and control surface effectiveness
  • Increases drag, stall speed, and fuel consumption
  • Even light frost can cut lift by ~30% and raise drag by ~40%
  • Severe icing may prevent climb, prevent level flight, or prevent recovery from a stall
  • High-lift devices (flaps, slats) may jam in or out of position
  • Control surfaces may freeze, reducing or eliminating pilot authority
  • Adds significant mass, particularly with clear (glaze) ice accumulation
  • Raises stall speed — the aircraft must fly faster to generate the same lift
  • Lowers climb performance — more thrust is consumed overcoming the added weight and drag
  • Clear ice can shift the centre of gravity (CG) aft, reducing longitudinal stability
  • Ice on pitot tubes, static ports, or angle-of-attack sensors can block or corrupt data
  • Airspeed, altitude, and vertical speed indications may become unreliable or freeze entirely
  • Stall warning flapper switches can freeze, eliminating the cockpit stall warning
  • Can obscure the forward view through the windscreen
  • May disrupt radio and navigation equipment
  • Can prevent landing gear retraction or extension

Icing raises stall speed through three compounding mechanisms:

  • Added weight — the aircraft must fly faster to generate sufficient lift at the critical angle of attack
  • Distorted wing profile — ice changes the wing’s camber and surface finish, reducing the maximum lift coefficient (cLmax). A lower cLmax means the wing stalls at a lower angle of attack and a higher airspeed
  • Reduced lift efficiency — disruption of the boundary layer by ice roughness increases turbulence over the upper surface, degrading the pressure differential that generates lift

Lower cLmax → higher stall speed → reduced margin above stall at any given airspeed


Types of Ice — Rime, Clear (Glaze), and Mixed

Section titled “Types of Ice — Rime, Clear (Glaze), and Mixed”

Three types of structural ice are relevant to PPL examinations. They form under different conditions and each presents distinct hazards.

PropertyRime IceClear (Glaze) IceMixed Ice
Droplet sizeSmall supercooled dropletsLarge supercooled dropletsBoth sizes present
Freezing behaviourFreezes instantly on impactSpreads along surface before freezingBoth behaviours simultaneously
Location of build-upStagnation pointSpreads along wing profileStagnation point and beyond
ShapeRough, irregular, distortedSmoother but heavier layerRough, irregular, and heavy
AppearanceWhite and cloudyTransparent — harder to detectWhite/opaque with embedded clear sections
WeightLighterHeavierHeaviest — combines both penalties
Profile distortionHigh — rough surface disrupts airflowModerate — follows wing shape more closelyHighest — combines roughness and mass
Most dangerous?NoIndividually more dangerous than rimeYes — worst combination of both types

Rime ice forms from small supercooled water droplets that freeze instantly on contact with the aircraft surface. Because the droplets freeze immediately, they trap air between them, producing a rough, white, opaque deposit. This build-up concentrates at the stagnation point — the leading edge — and creates a distorted, irregular profile that disrupts the boundary layer and significantly increases drag.

Clear ice forms from larger supercooled droplets that do not freeze instantly. Instead, they spread along the wing surface before freezing, following the wing’s contour more closely. This produces a smooth, transparent, dense layer that is harder to detect visually. Clear ice is generally heavier than rime ice for the same volume, making it more dangerous from a weight and CG perspective.

Mixed ice forms when both small and large supercooled droplets are present simultaneously — typically in cloud layers where temperature and droplet size vary. The result combines the worst characteristics of both rime and clear ice:

  • The large droplets spread and freeze as clear ice, adding significant weight
  • The small droplets freeze instantly on top, creating a rough, irregular outer surface
  • The combined deposit is heavier, rougher, and more aerodynamically disruptive than either type alone
  • It builds rapidly and is difficult to remove with standard de-icing systems

Mixed ice is considered the most hazardous structural ice type because it simultaneously maximises weight penalty, profile distortion, surface roughness, and boundary layer disruption.


Icing directly affects stall behaviour in ways that go beyond the numbers. Because the wing profile is distorted and cLmax is reduced, the critical angle of attack is reached sooner — at a lower geometric angle than the pilot expects. Combined with the frozen stall warning switch hazard, this means:

  • The stall may occur with no warning
  • It may occur at a higher airspeed than placarded
  • It may occur at a lower pitch attitude than expected
  • Recovery may be harder if control surfaces are partially frozen

EffectMechanismResult
Lift reductionDistorted profile, reduced cLmaxHigher stall speed
Drag increaseRough surface, disrupted boundary layerHigher fuel burn, reduced performance
Weight increaseIce mass accumulationHigher stall speed, reduced climb
CG shiftUneven ice distribution (especially clear ice aft)Reduced stability
Instrument failureBlocked pitot/static/AoA sensorsUnreliable flight data
Loss of stall warningFrozen flapper switchNo cockpit alert before stall
Control restrictionFrozen control surfaces or high-lift devicesReduced or lost control authority

AircrewExams is an independent study platform and is not officially affiliated with or endorsed by EASA, ICAO, or any national aviation authority. The examination practice materials, theory indices, and figures provided on aircrewexams.com are intended strictly as private pilot training supplements. We make no guarantees regarding accuracy, completeness, or individual exam success rates. Users are entirely responsible for verifying all technical and regulatory data against current, official aviation manuals before operational use. AircrewExams is not liable for any real-world aviation incidents, safety issues, or professional consequences. Use at your own risk.

Registered in England and Wales. Company No: 16927561
Registered Office: 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9JQ, United Kingdom